Аннотация
В публикации представлен обзор литературы по стандартам оказания экстренной медицинской помощи пациентам с закрытой травмой селезенки на фоне развития этапного лечения при использовании всего комплекса существующих методик лечения (стандартное, миниинвазивное, оперативное) по опубликованным литературным источникам. Тупую травму селезенки в большинстве случаев следует рассматривать как потенциально летальное состояние больного. Достичь значительных успехов в лечении этого состояния возможно только при соблюдении определенного алгоритма лечения с использованием всего спектра современных консервативных и оперативных методик, но прежде всего в условиях высокоспециализированного современного многофункционального медицинского центра.Литература
1. Rhee P. et al. Increasing trauma deaths in the United States // Ann. Surg. ‒ 2014. ‒ V. 260. ‒ P. 13–21. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000600.
2. Poletti P.A. et al. Blunt abdominal trauma patients: can organ injury be excluded without performing computed tomography? // J. Trauma. ‒ 2004. ‒ V. 57. ‒ P. 1072–1081. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000092680.73274.e1.
3. Mehta N. et al. An experience with blunt abdominal trauma: evaluation, management and outcome (электронный ресурс) // Clin. Pract. ‒ 2014. ‒ V. 4. ‒ P. 599. URL: http://www.clinicsandpractice.org/index.php/cp/article/view/599.
4. Girard E. et al. Management of splenic and pancreatic trauma // J. Visc. Surg. ‒ 2016. ‒ V. 153. ‒ Issue 4, Supplement August 2016. ‒ P. 45–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.04.005.
5. Coccolini F. et al. Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients // World J. Emerg. Surg. ‒ 2017. ‒ V. 12. ‒ P. 40. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-017-0151-4.
6. Richardson J.D. Changes in the management of injuries to the liver and spleen // J. Am. Coll. Surg. ‒ 2005. ‒ V. 200. ‒ P. 648–669. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.11.005.
7. Dayal M. et al. Grade IV splenic injury: When to consult interventional radiology-a case report and review of management protocols // Int. J. Gastrointest. Interv. ‒ 2024. ‒ V. 13. ‒ P. 41–45. DOI: 10.18528/ijgii230056.
8. Uranus S. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury // World J. Surg. ‒ 2001. ‒ V. 25. ‒ P. 1405–1407. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-001-0141-1.
9. Olthof D.C. et al. Evidence-based management and controversies in blunt splenic trauma // Curr. Trauma Rep. ‒ 2017. ‒ V. 3. ‒ P. 32–37. DOI: 10.1007/s40719-017-0074-2.
10. Fonseca A. et al. New horizons in splenic traumatism management: literature review // Discover Medicine. ‒ 2024. ‒ V. 1. ‒ P. 25–30. DOI: 10.1007/s44337-024-00039-1.
11. Capecci L.M. et al. Trauma centers with higher rates of angiography have a lesser incidence of splenectomy in the management of blunt splenic injury // Surgery. ‒ 2015. ‒ V. 158. ‒ P. 1020–1024. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.05.025.
12. Kozar R.A. et al. Organ injury scaling 2018 update: Spleen, liver, and kidney // J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. ‒ 2018. ‒ V. 85. ‒ P. 1119–1122. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002058.
13. Lauerman M.H. et al. Angioembolization significantly improves vascular injuries in blunt splenic trauma // Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. ‒ 2021. ‒ V. 47. ‒ No 1. ‒ P. 99–103. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01151-z.
14. Federico C. et al. The World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) spleen trauma classification: a useful tool in the management of splenic trauma // World J. Emerg. Surg. ‒ 2019. ‒ V. 14. ‒ P. 30. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-019-0246-1.
15. Podda M. et al. Follow‑up strategies for patients with splenic trauma managed non‑operatively: the 2022 World Society of Emergency Surgery consensus document // World J. of Emerg. Surg. ‒ 2022. ‒ V. 17. ‒ P. 52–90. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00457-5.
16. Carr J.A. et al. Correlation of operative and pathological injury grade with computed tomographic grade in the failed nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma // Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. ‒ 2012. ‒ V. 38. ‒ P. 433–438. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-012-0179-9.
17. Jesani H. et al. Splenic trauma, the way forward in reducing splenectomy: our 15-year experience // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. ‒ 2020. ‒ V. 102. ‒ P. 263–270. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0164.
18. Marmery H. et al. Optimization of selection for nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: comparison of MDCT grading systems // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. ‒ 2007. ‒ V. 189. ‒ P. 1421–1427. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2152.
19. Olthof D.C. et al. Reliability of injury grading systems for patients with blunt splenic trauma // Injury. ‒ 2014. ‒ V. 45. ‒ P. 146–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.013.
20. Pachter H.L. et al. Changing patterns in the management of splenic trauma: the impact of nonoperative management // Ann. Surg. ‒ 1998. ‒ V. 227. ‒ P. 708–717. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199805000-00011.
21. El Gammal A.S. et al. Different treatment modalities in traumatic splenic injuries // Menoufia Med. J. ‒ 2020. ‒ V. 33. ‒ P. 1322–1327. DOI: 10.4103/mmj.mmj_126_20.
22. Wiebke E.A. et al. Nonoperative management of splenic injuries in adults: an alternative in selected patients // Am. Surg. ‒ 1987. ‒ V. 53. ‒ P. 547–552. PMID: 3674596.
23. Cadeddu M. et al. Management of spleen injuries in the adult trauma population: a ten-year experience // Can. J. Surg. ‒ 2006. ‒ V. 49. ‒ P. 386–390. PMID: 17234065 PMCID: PMC3207549.
24. Osman M. et al. Conservative Management of Splenic Injury in Blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Single Center Experience // Cureus. ‒ 2023. ‒ V. 15. ‒ No 8. ‒ P. e43014 (1–5). DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43014.
25. Swetha B.M. et al. Modalities in the management of splenic trauma // Int. Surg. J. ‒ 2020. ‒ V. 7. ‒ P. 2940–2944. DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20203772.
26. Smith J.S.Jr. et al. Nonoperative management of the ruptured spleen: a revalidation of criteria // Surgery. ‒ 1996. ‒ V. 120. ‒ P. 745–750. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80026-2.
27. Gaarder C. et al. Nonoperative management of splenic injuries: improved results with angioembolization // J. Trauma. ‒ 2006. ‒ V. 61. ‒ P. 192–198. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000223466.62589.d9.
28. Larsen J.W. et al. Splenic injury from blunt trauma // BJS. ‒ 2023. ‒ V. 110. ‒ P. 1035–1038. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad060.
29. Sartorelli K.H. et al. Nonoperative management of hepatic, splenic, and renal injuries in adults with multiple injuries // J. Trauma. ‒ 2000. ‒ V. 49. ‒ P. 56–61. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200007000-00008.
30. Turaga A.H. Non-operative management of splenic trauma, a commentary // Ann. Surg. Res. ‒ 2023. ‒ V. 2. ‒ No 1. ‒ P. 1–3.
31. Haan J.M. et al. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: a 5-year experience // J. Trauma. ‒ 2005. ‒ V. 58. ‒ P. 492–498. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000154575.49388.74.
32. Вечорко В.И. и др. Травма селезенки: опыт гибридных вмешательств в условия флагманского городского скоропомощного центра // Кремлевская медицина. Клинический вестник. ‒ 2025. ‒ № 3. ‒ С. 96–101. [Vechorko V.I. et al. Spleen injury: experience of hybrid interventions in the conditions of the flagship city emergency center // Kremlin Medicine J. ‒ 2025. ‒ No 3. ‒ P. 96–101]. DOI: 10.48612/cgma/u7f7-pg8b-7bhh.
33. Meira Junior J.D. et al. Non-operative management of blunt splenic trauma: evolution, results and controversies // Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. ‒ 2021. ‒ V. 48. ‒ P. e20202777 (1–9). DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202777.
34. Sosada K. et al. Literature review of non-operative management of patients with blunt splenic injury: impact of splenic artery embolization // Wideochir. Inne. Tech. Maloinwazyjne. ‒ 2014. ‒ V. 9. ‒ P. 309–314. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.44251.
35. Wu S.C. et al. Complications associated with embolization in the treatment of blunt splenic injury // World J. Surg. ‒ 2008. ‒ V. 32. ‒ P. 476–482. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9322-x.
36. Tran S. et al. Endovascular management of splenic trauma // Surg. Pract. Sci. ‒ 2022. ‒ V. 8. ‒ P. 100061. DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100061.
37. Bhangu A. et al. Meta-analysis of predictive factors and outcomes for failure of non-operative management of blunt splenic trauma // Injury. ‒ 2012. ‒ V. 43. ‒ P. 1337–1346. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.09.010.
38. Shih H.C. et al. Spleen artery embolization aggravates endotoxin hyporesponse of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with spleen injury // J. Trauma. ‒ 2010. ‒ V.68. ‒ P. 532–537. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7bfaa.
39. Baranski A.G. et al. The dorsal pancreatic artery in pancreas procurement and transplantation: anatomical considerations and potential implications // Clin. Transpl. ‒ 2016. ‒ V. 30. ‒ P. 1360–1364. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12814.
40. Okahara M. et al. Arterial supply to the pancreas; variations and cross-sectional anatomy // Abdom. Imaging. ‒ 2010. ‒ V. 35. ‒ P. 134–142. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-009-9581-0.
41. Macchi V. et al. Clinical anatomy of the caudal pancreatic arteries and their relevance in the surgery of the splenic trauma // Ital. J. Anat. Embryol. ‒ 2014. ‒ V. 119. ‒ P. 141–147. PMID: 25665283.
42. Imbrogno B.F. et al. Splenic artery embolization in blunt trauma // Semin. Interv. Radiol. ‒ 2012. ‒ V. 29. ‒ P. 147–149. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312577.
43. Norotsky M.C. et al. Delayed presentation of splenic artery pseudoaneurysms following blunt abdominal trauma: case reports // J. Trauma. ‒ 1995. ‒ V. 38. ‒ P. 444–447. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199503000-00029.
44. Rong J. et al. The impacts of different embolization techniques on splenic artery embolization for blunt splenic injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Mil. Med. Res. ‒ 2017. ‒ V. 4. ‒ P. 17. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-017-0125-6.
45. Gregorczyk M. et al. The anatomy of the fundic branches of the stomach: preliminary results // Folia Morphol. (Warsz.). ‒ 2008. ‒ V. 67. ‒ P. 120–125. PMID: 18521810.
46. Quencer K.B. et al. Review of proximal splenic artery embolization in blunt abdominal trauma // CVIR Endovascular. ‒ 2019. ‒ V. 2. ‒ P. 2–12. DOI: 10.1186/s42155-019-0055-3.
47. Adam J.-P. et al. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: splenic vessel preservation compared with the Warshaw technique // JAMA Surg. ‒ 2013. ‒ V. 148. ‒ P. 246–252. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.768.
48. Bessoud B. et al. Proximal splenic artery embolization for blunt splenic injury: clinical, immunologic, and ultrasound-Doppler follow-up // J. Trauma. ‒ 2007. ‒ V. 62. ‒ P. 1481–1486. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318047dfb8.
49. Olthof D.C. et al. Antibody response to a T-cell-independent antigen is preserved after splenic artery embolization for trauma // Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ‒ 2014. ‒ V. 21. ‒ P. 1500–1504. DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00536-14.
50. Haan J.M. et al. Splenic embolization revisited: a multicenter review // J. Trauma. ‒ 2004. ‒ V. 56. ‒ P. 542–547. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000114069.73054.45.
51. Jeong E. et al. Very large haematoma following the nonoperative management of a blunt splenic injury in a patient with preexisting liver cirrhosis: a case report // J. Trauma Inj. ‒ 2022. ‒ V. 35. ‒ No 1. ‒ P. 66–70. DOI: 10.20408/jti.2021.0077.
52. Arvieux C. et al. Effect of prophylactic embolization on patients with blunt trauma at high risk of splenectomy: a randomized clinical trial // JAMA Surg. ‒ 2020. ‒ V. 155. ‒ P. 1102–1111. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3672.
53. Dodwad S.J. et al. How should the SPLASH trial inform the care of patients with blunt splenic trauma? // JAMA Surg. ‒ 2020. ‒ V. 155. ‒ P. 1111–1112. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3687.
54. LyBarger K.S. Review of Evidence Supporting the Arista™ Absorbable Powder Hemostat // Med. Devices (Auckl). ‒ 2024. ‒ V. 17. ‒ P. 173–188. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S442944.
55. Северцев А.Н. и др. Использование местных фармакологических средств для достижения окончательного гемостаза при резекциях печени // Хирургия. ‒ 2001. ‒ № 1. ‒ С. 86–90 [Severtsev A.N. et al. Use of local pharmacological agents to achieve final hemostasis during liver resections // Surgery. ‒ 2001. ‒ No 1. ‒ P. 86–90. In Russian].
56. Северцев А.Н. и др. Использование плазменных потоков (Plasmsurg 101) и фибринового клея (Tissucol) для достижения окончательного гемостаза на поверхности резецированной печени // Анналы хирургической гепатологии. ‒ 1997. ‒ Т. 2. ‒ С. 59–63 [Severtsev A.N. et al. Use of plasma flows (Plasmsurg 101) and fibrin glue (Tissucol) to achieve final hemostasis on the surface of the resected liver // Annals of surgical hepatology. ‒ 1997. ‒ V. 2. ‒ P. 59–63. In Russian].
57. Weber T. et al. Late results of heterotopic autotransplantation of splenic tissue into the greater omentum // World J. Surg. ‒ 1998. ‒ V. 22. ‒ P. 883–889. DOI: 10.1007/s002689900487.
58. Olmi S. et al. Use of fibrin glue (Tissucol) as a hemostatic in laparoscopic conservative treatment of spleen trauma // Surg. Endosc. ‒ 2007. ‒ V. 21. ‒ P. 2051–2054. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9288-7.
59. Li Y. et al. Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation for traumatic splenic rupture // J. Surg. Res. ‒ 2013. ‒ V. 185. ‒ P. 711–716. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.018.
60. Bove T. et al. Laparoscopic-assisted surgery of the spleen: clinical experience in expanding indications // J. Laparoendosc. Surg. ‒ 1996. ‒ V. 6. ‒ P. 213–217. DOI: 10.1089/lps.1996.6.213.
61. Ransom K.J. et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy following embolization for blunt trauma // JSLS. ‒ 2008. ‒ V. 12. ‒ P. 202–205. PMCID: PMC3016176.
62. Roh S. Splenic artery embolization for trauma: a narrative review // J. Trauma Inj. ‒ 2024. ‒ V. 37 (4). ‒ P. 252–261. DOI: 10.20408/jti.2024.0056.
63. Ahn S.R. et al. Non-operative management with angioembolization of grade IV and V renal injuries in a hybrid emergency room system // J. Trauma Inj. ‒2021. ‒ V. 34. ‒ P. 191–197. DOI: 10.20408/jti.2020.0071.
64. Panossian V.S. et al. Using interpretable artificial intelligence algorithms in the management of blunt splenic trauma: applications of optimal policy trees as a treatment prescription aid to improve patient mortality // Bioengineering. ‒ 2025. ‒ V. 12. ‒ P. 336–348. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12040336.