ТРАВМА СЕЛЕЗЕНКИ: ТЕНДЕНЦИИ ПЕРВОЙ ЧЕТВЕРТИ XXI ВЕКА
PDF

Ключевые слова

селезенка
тупая травма
нехирургическое лечение
спленэктомия

Как цитировать

Вечорко В. И., Северцев А. Н., Аносов В. Д., Шмаков А. Ф., Китиашвили И. З., Репин И. Г., Беспалова Е. А., Растригин И. С., Мурадян Т. Г., Тимбулатов Т. В., Шаповалов Д. А., Бюрчиев С. Н., Гусейнов А. ТРАВМА СЕЛЕЗЕНКИ: ТЕНДЕНЦИИ ПЕРВОЙ ЧЕТВЕРТИ XXI ВЕКА // Кремлевская медицина. Клинический вестник. 2025. Т. № 4. С. 86-93.

Аннотация

В публикации представлен обзор литературы по стандартам оказания экстренной медицинской помощи пациентам с закрытой травмой селезенки на фоне развития этапного лечения при использовании всего комплекса существующих методик лечения (стандартное, миниинвазивное, оперативное) по опубликованным литературным источникам. Тупую травму селезенки в большинстве случаев следует рассматривать как потенциально летальное состояние больного. Достичь значительных успехов в лечении этого состояния возможно только при соблюдении определенного алгоритма лечения с использованием всего спектра современных консервативных и оперативных методик, но прежде всего в условиях высокоспециализированного современного многофункционального медицинского центра.
PDF

Литература

1. Rhee P. et al. Increasing trauma deaths in the United States // Ann. Surg. ‒ 2014. ‒ V. 260. ‒ P. 13–21. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000600.

2. Poletti P.A. et al. Blunt abdominal trauma patients: can organ injury be excluded without performing computed tomography? // J. Trauma. ‒ 2004. ‒ V. 57. ‒ P. 1072–1081. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000092680.73274.e1.

3. Mehta N. et al. An experience with blunt abdominal trauma: evaluation, management and outcome (электронный ресурс) // Clin. Pract. ‒ 2014. ‒ V. 4. ‒ P. 599. URL: http://www.clinicsandpractice.org/index.php/cp/article/view/599.

4. Girard E. et al. Management of splenic and pancreatic trauma // J. Visc. Surg. ‒ 2016. ‒ V. 153. ‒ Issue 4, Supplement August 2016. ‒ P. 45–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.04.005.

5. Coccolini F. et al. Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients // World J. Emerg. Surg. ‒ 2017. ‒ V. 12. ‒ P. 40. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-017-0151-4.

6. Richardson J.D. Changes in the management of injuries to the liver and spleen // J. Am. Coll. Surg. ‒ 2005. ‒ V. 200. ‒ P. 648–669. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.11.005.

7. Dayal M. et al. Grade IV splenic injury: When to consult interventional radiology-a case report and review of management protocols // Int. J. Gastrointest. Interv. ‒ 2024. ‒ V. 13. ‒ P. 41–45. DOI: 10.18528/ijgii230056.

8. Uranus S. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury // World J. Surg. ‒ 2001. ‒ V. 25. ‒ P. 1405–1407. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-001-0141-1.

9. Olthof D.C. et al. Evidence-based management and controversies in blunt splenic trauma // Curr. Trauma Rep. ‒ 2017. ‒ V. 3. ‒ P. 32–37. DOI: 10.1007/s40719-017-0074-2.

10. Fonseca A. et al. New horizons in splenic traumatism management: literature review // Discover Medicine. ‒ 2024. ‒ V. 1. ‒ P. 25–30. DOI: 10.1007/s44337-024-00039-1.

11. Capecci L.M. et al. Trauma centers with higher rates of angiography have a lesser incidence of splenectomy in the management of blunt splenic injury // Surgery. ‒ 2015. ‒ V. 158. ‒ P. 1020–1024. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.05.025.

12. Kozar R.A. et al. Organ injury scaling 2018 update: Spleen, liver, and kidney // J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. ‒ 2018. ‒ V. 85. ‒ P. 1119–1122. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002058.

13. Lauerman M.H. et al. Angioembolization significantly improves vascular injuries in blunt splenic trauma // Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. ‒ 2021. ‒ V. 47. ‒ No 1. ‒ P. 99–103. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01151-z.

14. Federico C. et al. The World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) spleen trauma classification: a useful tool in the management of splenic trauma // World J. Emerg. Surg. ‒ 2019. ‒ V. 14. ‒ P. 30. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-019-0246-1.

15. Podda M. et al. Follow‑up strategies for patients with splenic trauma managed non‑operatively: the 2022 World Society of Emergency Surgery consensus document // World J. of Emerg. Surg. ‒ 2022. ‒ V. 17. ‒ P. 52–90. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00457-5.

16. Carr J.A. et al. Correlation of operative and pathological injury grade with computed tomographic grade in the failed nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma // Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. ‒ 2012. ‒ V. 38. ‒ P. 433–438. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-012-0179-9.

17. Jesani H. et al. Splenic trauma, the way forward in reducing splenectomy: our 15-year experience // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. ‒ 2020. ‒ V. 102. ‒ P. 263–270. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0164.

18. Marmery H. et al. Optimization of selection for nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: comparison of MDCT grading systems // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. ‒ 2007. ‒ V. 189. ‒ P. 1421–1427. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2152.

19. Olthof D.C. et al. Reliability of injury grading systems for patients with blunt splenic trauma // Injury. ‒ 2014. ‒ V. 45. ‒ P. 146–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.013.

20. Pachter H.L. et al. Changing patterns in the management of splenic trauma: the impact of nonoperative management // Ann. Surg. ‒ 1998. ‒ V. 227. ‒ P. 708–717. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199805000-00011.

21. El Gammal A.S. et al. Different treatment modalities in traumatic splenic injuries // Menoufia Med. J. ‒ 2020. ‒ V. 33. ‒ P. 1322–1327. DOI: 10.4103/mmj.mmj_126_20.

22. Wiebke E.A. et al. Nonoperative management of splenic injuries in adults: an alternative in selected patients // Am. Surg. ‒ 1987. ‒ V. 53. ‒ P. 547–552. PMID: 3674596.

23. Cadeddu M. et al. Management of spleen injuries in the adult trauma population: a ten-year experience // Can. J. Surg. ‒ 2006. ‒ V. 49. ‒ P. 386–390. PMID: 17234065 PMCID: PMC3207549.

24. Osman M. et al. Conservative Management of Splenic Injury in Blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Single Center Experience // Cureus. ‒ 2023. ‒ V. 15. ‒ No 8. ‒ P. e43014 (1–5). DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43014.

25. Swetha B.M. et al. Modalities in the management of splenic trauma // Int. Surg. J. ‒ 2020. ‒ V. 7. ‒ P. 2940–2944. DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20203772.

26. Smith J.S.Jr. et al. Nonoperative management of the ruptured spleen: a revalidation of criteria // Surgery. ‒ 1996. ‒ V. 120. ‒ P. 745–750. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80026-2.

27. Gaarder C. et al. Nonoperative management of splenic injuries: improved results with angioembolization // J. Trauma. ‒ 2006. ‒ V. 61. ‒ P. 192–198. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000223466.62589.d9.

28. Larsen J.W. et al. Splenic injury from blunt trauma // BJS. ‒ 2023. ‒ V. 110. ‒ P. 1035–1038. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad060.

29. Sartorelli K.H. et al. Nonoperative management of hepatic, splenic, and renal injuries in adults with multiple injuries // J. Trauma. ‒ 2000. ‒ V. 49. ‒ P. 56–61. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200007000-00008.

30. Turaga A.H. Non-operative management of splenic trauma, a commentary // Ann. Surg. Res. ‒ 2023. ‒ V. 2. ‒ No 1. ‒ P. 1–3.

31. Haan J.M. et al. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: a 5-year experience // J. Trauma. ‒ 2005. ‒ V. 58. ‒ P. 492–498. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000154575.49388.74.

32. Вечорко В.И. и др. Травма селезенки: опыт гибридных вмешательств в условия флагманского городского скоропомощного центра // Кремлевская медицина. Клинический вестник. ‒ 2025. ‒ № 3. ‒ С. 96–101. [Vechorko V.I. et al. Spleen injury: experience of hybrid interventions in the conditions of the flagship city emergency center // Kremlin Medicine J. ‒ 2025. ‒ No 3. ‒ P. 96–101]. DOI: 10.48612/cgma/u7f7-pg8b-7bhh.

33. Meira Junior J.D. et al. Non-operative management of blunt splenic trauma: evolution, results and controversies // Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. ‒ 2021. ‒ V. 48. ‒ P. e20202777 (1–9). DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202777.

34. Sosada K. et al. Literature review of non-operative management of patients with blunt splenic injury: impact of splenic artery embolization // Wideochir. Inne. Tech. Maloinwazyjne. ‒ 2014. ‒ V. 9. ‒ P. 309–314. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.44251.

35. Wu S.C. et al. Complications associated with embolization in the treatment of blunt splenic injury // World J. Surg. ‒ 2008. ‒ V. 32. ‒ P. 476–482. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9322-x.

36. Tran S. et al. Endovascular management of splenic trauma // Surg. Pract. Sci. ‒ 2022. ‒ V. 8. ‒ P. 100061. DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100061.

37. Bhangu A. et al. Meta-analysis of predictive factors and outcomes for failure of non-operative management of blunt splenic trauma // Injury. ‒ 2012. ‒ V. 43. ‒ P. 1337–1346. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.09.010.

38. Shih H.C. et al. Spleen artery embolization aggravates endotoxin hyporesponse of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with spleen injury // J. Trauma. ‒ 2010. ‒ V.68. ‒ P. 532–537. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7bfaa.

39. Baranski A.G. et al. The dorsal pancreatic artery in pancreas procurement and transplantation: anatomical considerations and potential implications // Clin. Transpl. ‒ 2016. ‒ V. 30. ‒ P. 1360–1364. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12814.

40. Okahara M. et al. Arterial supply to the pancreas; variations and cross-sectional anatomy // Abdom. Imaging. ‒ 2010. ‒ V. 35. ‒ P. 134–142. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-009-9581-0.

41. Macchi V. et al. Clinical anatomy of the caudal pancreatic arteries and their relevance in the surgery of the splenic trauma // Ital. J. Anat. Embryol. ‒ 2014. ‒ V. 119. ‒ P. 141–147. PMID: 25665283.

42. Imbrogno B.F. et al. Splenic artery embolization in blunt trauma // Semin. Interv. Radiol. ‒ 2012. ‒ V. 29. ‒ P. 147–149. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312577.

43. Norotsky M.C. et al. Delayed presentation of splenic artery pseudoaneurysms following blunt abdominal trauma: case reports // J. Trauma. ‒ 1995. ‒ V. 38. ‒ P. 444–447. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199503000-00029.

44. Rong J. et al. The impacts of different embolization techniques on splenic artery embolization for blunt splenic injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Mil. Med. Res. ‒ 2017. ‒ V. 4. ‒ P. 17. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-017-0125-6.

45. Gregorczyk M. et al. The anatomy of the fundic branches of the stomach: preliminary results // Folia Morphol. (Warsz.). ‒ 2008. ‒ V. 67. ‒ P. 120–125. PMID: 18521810.

46. Quencer K.B. et al. Review of proximal splenic artery embolization in blunt abdominal trauma // CVIR Endovascular. ‒ 2019. ‒ V. 2. ‒ P. 2–12. DOI: 10.1186/s42155-019-0055-3.

47. Adam J.-P. et al. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: splenic vessel preservation compared with the Warshaw technique // JAMA Surg. ‒ 2013. ‒ V. 148. ‒ P. 246–252. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.768.

48. Bessoud B. et al. Proximal splenic artery embolization for blunt splenic injury: clinical, immunologic, and ultrasound-Doppler follow-up // J. Trauma. ‒ 2007. ‒ V. 62. ‒ P. 1481–1486. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318047dfb8.

49. Olthof D.C. et al. Antibody response to a T-cell-independent antigen is preserved after splenic artery embolization for trauma // Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ‒ 2014. ‒ V. 21. ‒ P. 1500–1504. DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00536-14.

50. Haan J.M. et al. Splenic embolization revisited: a multicenter review // J. Trauma. ‒ 2004. ‒ V. 56. ‒ P. 542–547. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000114069.73054.45.

51. Jeong E. et al. Very large haematoma following the nonoperative management of a blunt splenic injury in a patient with preexisting liver cirrhosis: a case report // J. Trauma Inj. ‒ 2022. ‒ V. 35. ‒ No 1. ‒ P. 66–70. DOI: 10.20408/jti.2021.0077.

52. Arvieux C. et al. Effect of prophylactic embolization on patients with blunt trauma at high risk of splenectomy: a randomized clinical trial // JAMA Surg. ‒ 2020. ‒ V. 155. ‒ P. 1102–1111. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3672.

53. Dodwad S.J. et al. How should the SPLASH trial inform the care of patients with blunt splenic trauma? // JAMA Surg. ‒ 2020. ‒ V. 155. ‒ P. 1111–1112. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3687.

54. LyBarger K.S. Review of Evidence Supporting the Arista™ Absorbable Powder Hemostat // Med. Devices (Auckl). ‒ 2024. ‒ V. 17. ‒ P. 173–188. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S442944.

55. Северцев А.Н. и др. Использование местных фармакологических средств для достижения окончательного гемостаза при резекциях печени // Хирургия. ‒ 2001. ‒ № 1. ‒ С. 86–90 [Severtsev A.N. et al. Use of local pharmacological agents to achieve final hemostasis during liver resections // Surgery. ‒ 2001. ‒ No 1. ‒ P. 86–90. In Russian].

56. Северцев А.Н. и др. Использование плазменных потоков (Plasmsurg 101) и фибринового клея (Tissucol) для достижения окончательного гемостаза на поверхности резецированной печени // Анналы хирургической гепатологии. ‒ 1997. ‒ Т. 2. ‒ С. 59–63 [Severtsev A.N. et al. Use of plasma flows (Plasmsurg 101) and fibrin glue (Tissucol) to achieve final hemostasis on the surface of the resected liver // Annals of surgical hepatology. ‒ 1997. ‒ V. 2. ‒ P. 59–63. In Russian].

57. Weber T. et al. Late results of heterotopic autotransplantation of splenic tissue into the greater omentum // World J. Surg. ‒ 1998. ‒ V. 22. ‒ P. 883–889. DOI: 10.1007/s002689900487.

58. Olmi S. et al. Use of fibrin glue (Tissucol) as a hemostatic in laparoscopic conservative treatment of spleen trauma // Surg. Endosc. ‒ 2007. ‒ V. 21. ‒ P. 2051–2054. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9288-7.

59. Li Y. et al. Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation for traumatic splenic rupture // J. Surg. Res. ‒ 2013. ‒ V. 185. ‒ P. 711–716. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.018.

60. Bove T. et al. Laparoscopic-assisted surgery of the spleen: clinical experience in expanding indications // J. Laparoendosc. Surg. ‒ 1996. ‒ V. 6. ‒ P. 213–217. DOI: 10.1089/lps.1996.6.213.

61. Ransom K.J. et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy following embolization for blunt trauma // JSLS. ‒ 2008. ‒ V. 12. ‒ P. 202–205. PMCID: PMC3016176.

62. Roh S. Splenic artery embolization for trauma: a narrative review // J. Trauma Inj. ‒ 2024. ‒ V. 37 (4). ‒ P. 252–261. DOI: 10.20408/jti.2024.0056.

63. Ahn S.R. et al. Non-operative management with angioembolization of grade IV and V renal injuries in a hybrid emergency room system // J. Trauma Inj. ‒2021. ‒ V. 34. ‒ P. 191–197. DOI: 10.20408/jti.2020.0071.

64. Panossian V.S. et al. Using interpretable artificial intelligence algorithms in the management of blunt splenic trauma: applications of optimal policy trees as a treatment prescription aid to improve patient mortality // Bioengineering. ‒ 2025. ‒ V. 12. ‒ P. 336–348. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12040336.