Использование специализированных рабочих станций и интегрированных систем архивации и передачи изображений (PACS) в практике отделений и кабинетов ультразвуковых исследований сердечно-сосудистой системы
ПРОБЛЕМЫ ИНФОРМАТИЗАЦИИ ЛЕЧЕБНО-ДИАГНОСТИЧЕСКОГО ПРОЦЕССА
Дата публикации: апреля 5, 2015
Ключевые слова
рабочая станция
система архивации и передачи изображений
эхокардиография
workstation
picture archiving and communication system (PACS)
DICOM
echocardiography
система архивации и передачи изображений
эхокардиография
workstation
picture archiving and communication system (PACS)
DICOM
echocardiography
Как цитировать
[1]
Г. Гогин, Использование специализированных рабочих станций и интегрированных систем архивации и передачи изображений (PACS) в практике отделений и кабинетов ультразвуковых исследований сердечно-сосудистой системы, КМКВ, вып. 2, апр. 2015.
Аннотация
В статье представлен опыт совместного использования специализированных рабочих станций и интегрированныхсистем архивации и передачи изображений (PACS) в практике отделения функциональной диагностики на примерекабинетов ультразвуковых исследований сердечно-сосудистой системы. Такой подход позволяет изменить структуруультразвуковых исследований сердца и сосудов путем переноса оценочно-аналитической и консультативной частиисследования с диагностических приборов на рабочие станции. Реализация указанного подхода позволяет увеличитьпропускную способность дорогостоящих диагностических ультразвуковых приборов, повысить качество диагностикиза счет широкого применения консультативной помощи, оптимизировать учебно-методическую и научную работу.The article presents the authors’ experience in the joint application of special working stations and integrated picturearchiving and transmitting systems (PACS) in rooms for ultrasound examination of the cardio-vascular system.Such an approach allows to change the structure of ultrasound examinations of the heart and vessels when the evaluatinganalyticaland consultative parts of ultrasound examination are transferred from a diagnostic apparatus to a working station.Such an approach allows to enlarge the capacity of expensive diagnostic apparatuses increasing the number of examinedpatients, to improve the diagnostic quality due to larger consultative help, to optimize trainings, methodological and scientificwork.Литература
1. Badano L.P., Di Chiara A., Werren M., Sabbadini
C., Fioretti P.M. Digital revolution in the echocardiography
laboratory. Current status and future perspectives. Ital Heart J
Suppl. – 2000. – 1(12):1561-75.
2. Balogh N., Kerkovits G., Horváth L., Punys J., Punys V.,
Jurkevicius R., Eichelberg M., Riesmeier J., Jensh P., Lemoine
D. Cardiac digital image loops and multimedia reports over the
internet using DICOM. Stud Health Technol Inform. – 2002.
– 90: 148-51.
3. Bosch J.G. Digital image processing and automated
image analysis in echocardiography. In: Otto C. The practice of
clinical echocardiography, fourth edition. – 2012. – S.219-221.
Elsevier Inc.
4. Carrino J.A., Unkel P.J., Miller I.D., Bowser
C.L., Freckleton M.W., Johnson T.G. Large-scale PACS
implementation. J Digit Imaging, – 1998. – (3 Suppl 1): 3-7.
5. Foord K.D. PACS workstation respecification: display,
data flow, system integration, and environmental issues, derived
from analysis of the Conquest Hospital pre-DICOM PACS
experience. Eur Radiol. – 1999. – 9(6): 1161-9.
6. Graham R.N., Perriss R.W., Scarsbrook A.F. DICOM
demystified: a review of digital file formats and their use in
radiological practice. Clin Radiol. – 2005. – 60(11): 1133-40.
7. Hains I.M., Georgiou A., Westbrook J.I.. The impact of
PACS on clinician work practices in the intensive care unit: a
systematic review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc. –
19(4): 506-13.
8. Joshi V., Narra V.R., Joshi K., Lee K., Melson D. PACS
Administrators' and radiologists' perspective on the importance
of features for PACS selection. J. Digit Imaging, 2014.
9. Kolias T.J., Hagan P.G., Chetcuti S.J., Eberhart D.L.,
Kline N.M., Lucas S.D., Hamilton J.D. New universal strain
software accurately assesses cardiac systolic and diastolic function
using speckle tracking echocardiography. Echocardiography.
Jan 22, 2014 (doi: 10.1111/echo.12512. Epub).
10. Li M., Wilson D., Wong M., Xthona A.. The evolution
of display technologies in PACS applications. Comput Med
Imaging Graph. – 2003. – 27(2-3):175-84.
11. Thomas J.D. The DICOM image formatting standard:
its role in echocardiography and angiography. Int J Card
Imaging. 14 Suppl 1:1-6, 1998.
12. Thomas J.D., Adams D.B., DeVries S. Guidelines and
recommendations for digital echocardiography. A report from
the digital echocardiography committee of the American society
of echocardiography. J Am Soc of Echocardiography. – 2005.
13. Trambaiolo P., Posteraro A., Salustri A., Amici E.,
Piaggio M., Decanini C., Gambelli G. Digital echocardiography
laboratory. Ital Heart J Suppl. – 2004. – 5(7): 517-26.
14. Zhang J., Sun J., Stahl J.N. PACS and Web-based
image distribution and display. Comput Med Imaging Graph. –
2003. – 27(2-3): 197-206.
C., Fioretti P.M. Digital revolution in the echocardiography
laboratory. Current status and future perspectives. Ital Heart J
Suppl. – 2000. – 1(12):1561-75.
2. Balogh N., Kerkovits G., Horváth L., Punys J., Punys V.,
Jurkevicius R., Eichelberg M., Riesmeier J., Jensh P., Lemoine
D. Cardiac digital image loops and multimedia reports over the
internet using DICOM. Stud Health Technol Inform. – 2002.
– 90: 148-51.
3. Bosch J.G. Digital image processing and automated
image analysis in echocardiography. In: Otto C. The practice of
clinical echocardiography, fourth edition. – 2012. – S.219-221.
Elsevier Inc.
4. Carrino J.A., Unkel P.J., Miller I.D., Bowser
C.L., Freckleton M.W., Johnson T.G. Large-scale PACS
implementation. J Digit Imaging, – 1998. – (3 Suppl 1): 3-7.
5. Foord K.D. PACS workstation respecification: display,
data flow, system integration, and environmental issues, derived
from analysis of the Conquest Hospital pre-DICOM PACS
experience. Eur Radiol. – 1999. – 9(6): 1161-9.
6. Graham R.N., Perriss R.W., Scarsbrook A.F. DICOM
demystified: a review of digital file formats and their use in
radiological practice. Clin Radiol. – 2005. – 60(11): 1133-40.
7. Hains I.M., Georgiou A., Westbrook J.I.. The impact of
PACS on clinician work practices in the intensive care unit: a
systematic review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc. –
19(4): 506-13.
8. Joshi V., Narra V.R., Joshi K., Lee K., Melson D. PACS
Administrators' and radiologists' perspective on the importance
of features for PACS selection. J. Digit Imaging, 2014.
9. Kolias T.J., Hagan P.G., Chetcuti S.J., Eberhart D.L.,
Kline N.M., Lucas S.D., Hamilton J.D. New universal strain
software accurately assesses cardiac systolic and diastolic function
using speckle tracking echocardiography. Echocardiography.
Jan 22, 2014 (doi: 10.1111/echo.12512. Epub).
10. Li M., Wilson D., Wong M., Xthona A.. The evolution
of display technologies in PACS applications. Comput Med
Imaging Graph. – 2003. – 27(2-3):175-84.
11. Thomas J.D. The DICOM image formatting standard:
its role in echocardiography and angiography. Int J Card
Imaging. 14 Suppl 1:1-6, 1998.
12. Thomas J.D., Adams D.B., DeVries S. Guidelines and
recommendations for digital echocardiography. A report from
the digital echocardiography committee of the American society
of echocardiography. J Am Soc of Echocardiography. – 2005.
13. Trambaiolo P., Posteraro A., Salustri A., Amici E.,
Piaggio M., Decanini C., Gambelli G. Digital echocardiography
laboratory. Ital Heart J Suppl. – 2004. – 5(7): 517-26.
14. Zhang J., Sun J., Stahl J.N. PACS and Web-based
image distribution and display. Comput Med Imaging Graph. –
2003. – 27(2-3): 197-206.