ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ ИЗОКИНЕТИЧЕСКИХ ДИНАМОМЕТРОВ В РЕАБИЛИТАЦИИ И ВОССТАНОВЛЕНИИ ВЫСОКОКВАЛИФИЦИРОВАННЫХ СПОРТСМЕНОВ ПОСЛЕ ТРАВМ И ОПЕРАЦИЙ КОЛЕННОГО СУСТАВА
Лекция
Дата публикации: декабря 22, 2023
Ключевые слова
изокинетические тренировки
биомеханические комплексы
роботизированная биомеханика
трава коленного сустава
биомеханические комплексы
роботизированная биомеханика
трава коленного сустава
Как цитировать
Петрова В. В., Хан А. В., Назарян С. Е., Шулепов П. А., Петрова М. С. ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ ИЗОКИНЕТИЧЕСКИХ ДИНАМОМЕТРОВ В РЕАБИЛИТАЦИИ И ВОССТАНОВЛЕНИИ ВЫСОКОКВАЛИФИЦИРОВАННЫХ СПОРТСМЕНОВ ПОСЛЕ ТРАВМ И ОПЕРАЦИЙ КОЛЕННОГО СУСТАВА // Кремлевская медицина. Клинический вестник. 2023. Т. № 4. С. 69-72.
Аннотация
В статье проведены сведения о различных подходах к практическому применению изокинетических динамометров (роботизированных биомеханических комплексов) на различных этапах реабилитационного процесса высококвалифицированных спортсменов после травм и операций коленного сустава. Обосновывается рациональность и необходимость их применения у спортсменов. При этом обращает на себя внимание отсутствие методологического аппарата адекватных диагностических и реабилитационных методик. Не доработан вопрос о единых протоколах диагностического тестирования, уровень погрешности в измерениях у авторов имеет широкий диапазон, отсутствует единое мнение о критериях возврата к спортивной деятельности.Литература
1. Chamorro C. et al. Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand held dynamometry and isokinetic dynamometry in the hip, knee and ankle joint: systematic review and meta-analysis //Open medicine. – 2017. – V. 12. – №. 1. – P. 359-375.
2. Kelln B. M. et al. Hand-held dynamometry: reliability of lower extremity muscle testing in healthy, physically active, young adults //Journal of sport rehabilitation. – 2008. – V. 17. – №. 2. – P. 160-170. doi: 10.1123/jsr.17.2.160
3. Lu T.W., Hsu H.C., Chang L.Y., Chen H.L. Lu T. W. et al. Enhancing the examiner's resisting force improves the reliability of manual muscle strength measurements: comparison of a new device with hand-held dynamometry //Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. – 2007. – V. 39. – №. 9. – P. 679-684. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0107
4. Arnold C. M. et al. The reliability and validity of handheld dynamometry for the measurement of lower-extremity muscle strength in older adults //The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. – 2010. – V. 24. – №. 3. – P. 815-824. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181aa36b8
5. Jara C. A. C. et al. Validación y fiabilidad del dispositivo Haefni Health System 1.0 en la medición de la velocidad en el rango isocinético //Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte. – 2014. – V. 14. – №. 2. – P. 91-98. doi: 10.4321/S1578-84232014000200010
6. Martin H. J. et al. Is hand-held dynamometry useful for the measurement of quadriceps strength in older people? A comparison with the gold standard Biodex dynamometry //Gerontology. – 2006. – V. 52. – №. 3. – P. 154-159. doi: 10.1159/000091824
7. Meyer C. et al. Test-retest reliability of innovated strength tests for hip muscles //PloS one. – 2013. – V. 8. – №. 11. – P. e81149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081149.
8. Drouin J. M. et al. Reliability and validity of the Biodex system 3 pro isokinetic dynamometer velocity, torque and position measurements //European journal of applied physiology. – 2004. – V. 91. – P. 22-29. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0933-0
9. Lake D. A., Wofford N. H. Effect of therapeutic modalities on patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review //Sports Health. – 2011. – V. 3. – №. 2. – P. 182-189. doi: 10.1177/1941738111398583.
10. Noyes F. R., Barber Westin S. D. Anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention training in female athletes: a systematic review of injury reduction and results of athletic performance tests //Sports health. – 2012. – V. 4. – №. 1. – P. 36-46. doi: 10.1177/1941738111430203.
11. Abrams G. D. et al. Functional performance testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review //Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. – 2014. – V. 2. – №. 1. – P. 2325967113518305. doi: 10.1177/2325967113518305
12. Barber-Westin S. D., Noyes F. R. Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction //Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery. – 2011. – V. 27. – №. 12. – P. 1697-1705. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.09.009
13. McCall A. et al. Injury risk factors, screening tests and preventative strategies: a systematic review of the evidence that underpins the perceptions and practices of 44 football (soccer) teams from various premier leagues //British journal of sports medicine. – 2015. – V. 49. – №. 9. – P. 583-589. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094104
14. Maniar N. et al. Hamstring strength and flexibility after hamstring strain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis //British Journal of Sports Medicine. – 2016. – V. 50. – №. 15. – P. 909-920. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095311
15. Ashigbi E. Y. K., Banzer W., Niederer D. Return to Sport Tests' Prognostic Value for Reinjury Risk after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review //Medicine and science in sports and exercise. – 2020. – V. 52. – №. 6. – P. 1263-1271. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002246
2. Kelln B. M. et al. Hand-held dynamometry: reliability of lower extremity muscle testing in healthy, physically active, young adults //Journal of sport rehabilitation. – 2008. – V. 17. – №. 2. – P. 160-170. doi: 10.1123/jsr.17.2.160
3. Lu T.W., Hsu H.C., Chang L.Y., Chen H.L. Lu T. W. et al. Enhancing the examiner's resisting force improves the reliability of manual muscle strength measurements: comparison of a new device with hand-held dynamometry //Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. – 2007. – V. 39. – №. 9. – P. 679-684. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0107
4. Arnold C. M. et al. The reliability and validity of handheld dynamometry for the measurement of lower-extremity muscle strength in older adults //The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. – 2010. – V. 24. – №. 3. – P. 815-824. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181aa36b8
5. Jara C. A. C. et al. Validación y fiabilidad del dispositivo Haefni Health System 1.0 en la medición de la velocidad en el rango isocinético //Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte. – 2014. – V. 14. – №. 2. – P. 91-98. doi: 10.4321/S1578-84232014000200010
6. Martin H. J. et al. Is hand-held dynamometry useful for the measurement of quadriceps strength in older people? A comparison with the gold standard Biodex dynamometry //Gerontology. – 2006. – V. 52. – №. 3. – P. 154-159. doi: 10.1159/000091824
7. Meyer C. et al. Test-retest reliability of innovated strength tests for hip muscles //PloS one. – 2013. – V. 8. – №. 11. – P. e81149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081149.
8. Drouin J. M. et al. Reliability and validity of the Biodex system 3 pro isokinetic dynamometer velocity, torque and position measurements //European journal of applied physiology. – 2004. – V. 91. – P. 22-29. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0933-0
9. Lake D. A., Wofford N. H. Effect of therapeutic modalities on patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review //Sports Health. – 2011. – V. 3. – №. 2. – P. 182-189. doi: 10.1177/1941738111398583.
10. Noyes F. R., Barber Westin S. D. Anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention training in female athletes: a systematic review of injury reduction and results of athletic performance tests //Sports health. – 2012. – V. 4. – №. 1. – P. 36-46. doi: 10.1177/1941738111430203.
11. Abrams G. D. et al. Functional performance testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review //Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. – 2014. – V. 2. – №. 1. – P. 2325967113518305. doi: 10.1177/2325967113518305
12. Barber-Westin S. D., Noyes F. R. Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction //Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery. – 2011. – V. 27. – №. 12. – P. 1697-1705. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.09.009
13. McCall A. et al. Injury risk factors, screening tests and preventative strategies: a systematic review of the evidence that underpins the perceptions and practices of 44 football (soccer) teams from various premier leagues //British journal of sports medicine. – 2015. – V. 49. – №. 9. – P. 583-589. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094104
14. Maniar N. et al. Hamstring strength and flexibility after hamstring strain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis //British Journal of Sports Medicine. – 2016. – V. 50. – №. 15. – P. 909-920. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095311
15. Ashigbi E. Y. K., Banzer W., Niederer D. Return to Sport Tests' Prognostic Value for Reinjury Risk after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review //Medicine and science in sports and exercise. – 2020. – V. 52. – №. 6. – P. 1263-1271. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002246