POTENTIALS OF EMERGENT PROPHYLACTICS OF NEW CORONAVIRUS INFECTION COVID-19 IN HEMATOLOGICAL PATIENTS
E. V. Ignateva
Main Military Clinical Hospital named after Academician N.N. Burdenko, Moscow, Russia
S. P. Kazakov
Main Military Clinical Hospital named after Academician N.N. Burdenko, Moscow, Russia
O. A. Rukavitsyn
Main Military Clinical Hospital named after Academician N.N. Burdenko, Moscow, Russia
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
antibodies

How to Cite

Ignateva E. V., Kazakov S. P., Rukavitsyn O. A. POTENTIALS OF EMERGENT PROPHYLACTICS OF NEW CORONAVIRUS INFECTION COVID-19 IN HEMATOLOGICAL PATIENTS // Kremlin Medicine Journal. 2023. VOL. № 3. С. 39-44.
PDF (Русский)

Abstract

Introduction. The new COVID-19 coronavirus infection makes treatment of patients with hematological pathologies more complicated, as well as worsens their prognosis. Therefore, pre-contact emergent prevention is important in this group of patients, for which the preparation of recombinant human monoclonal antibodies (AB) of IgGIk class Tixagevimab + Cilgavimab (Evusheld) has been approved. Purpose. To study AB dynamics and duration to SARS-CoV-2 after Tixagevimab + Cilgavimab administration in patients with hematological pathologies, to determine the level of IgG class protective antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 S-protein and AB sufficient level to prevent COVID-19 infection. Materials and methods. 44 patients with hematological diseases, who were treated in the hospital, were prescribed Evusheld as COVID-19 emergent protective agent. Out of these 44 patients, 29 (65.9%) had lymphomas, 11 (25%) – multiple myelomas, and 4 (9.1%) – acute leukemia. AB of IgG class to SARS-CoV-2 S-protein (quantitative method, BAU/ml) and AB of IgM class to SARS-CoV-2 S-and N-proteins (semi-quantitative method, coefficient of positivity) were studied. Results and discussion. The studied parameters were analyzed before Evusheld administration , on days 3–7 and in 1, 3 and 6 months after it. Patients were divided into three groups depending on the protective AB level before Evusheld administration: first- AB of IgG class to SARS-CoV-2 S-protein less than 150 BAU/ml (36.4% of patients); second – sufficient level of protective antibodies from 150 to 550 BAU/ml ( 27.3% of patients ); third – AB of IgG class to SARS-CoV-2 S-protein more than 550 BAU/ml (36.4% of patients). The researchers found out that patients who survived COVID-19 or were vaccinated within six months have a higher level of IgG-class AB to SARS-CoV-2 S-protein. In the first month after preparation administration, 93.75% of patients had AB to SARS-CoV-2 IgG more than 2000 BAU/ml. The decrease of AB level was registered in three months after Evusheld administration. 7 (15.9%) patients fell ill with COVID-19 within one – two months after administration of the studied preparation. The overall mortality rate in the trial group was 18%. Conclusion. Administration of the combined preparation Tixagevimab + Cilgavimab decreases the incidence of new corona virus infection in hematological patients. A proper immune response in hematological patients is achievable at the level of protective AB of IgG-class to S-protein more than 550 BAU/ml. Patients who survived new corona virus infection or who were vaccinated within six months have higher level of protective antibodies. Therefore, before Tixagevimab + Cilgavimab administration, it is necessary to assess the level of IgG-class AB to S-protein. After administration of combined Tixagevimab + Cilgavimab preparation, the level of IgG-class AB to S-protein should be monitored every three months.
PDF (Русский)

References

1. World Health Organization. Coronavirusdisease (COVID-2019) situationreports. 2020.
2. Ignateva E. et al. Features of the state of cellular immunity in patients with hematology diseases who have undergone COVID-19 // Hematology. Transfusiology. Eastern Europe. – 2022. – V. 8. – №. 2. – P. 110–121. In Russian. doi: 10.34883/PI.2022.8.2.011.
3. Shi C. et al. Predictors of mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis // BMC infectious diseases. – 2021. – V. 21. – P. 1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06369-0.
4. Zinchenko A.V. et al. СOVID-19 in a hematological hospital, course and outcomes // Hematology. Transfustology. Eastern Europe. – 2021. – V. 7. – №. 2. – P. 131–141. In Russian. doi: 10.34883/PI.2021.7.2.001.
5. Vijenthira A. et al. Outcomes of patients with hematologic malignancies and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3377 patients // Blood. – 2020. – V. 136. – №. 25. – С. 2881–2892. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020008824.
6. Pagano L. et al. COVID-19 in vaccinated adult patients with hematological malignancies: preliminary results from EPICOVIDEHA // Blood. – 2022. – V. 139. – №. 10. – P. 1588-1592. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014124
7. Stuver R. et al. Activity of AZD7442 (tixagevimab-cilgavimab) against Omicron SARS-CoV-2 in patients with hematologic malignancies // Cancer Cell. – 2022. – V. 40. – №. 6. – P. 590–591. doi: 10.1016 /j.ccell.2022.05.007.
8. Feng S. et al. Correlates of protection against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection // Nat. Med. – 2021. – V. 27. – №. 11. – P. 2032–2040. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01540-1.
9. SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quantitative Reagents for ARCHITECT (SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant Reagent Kit) – Abbott test kit instructions, December 2020.
10. Kazakov S. P. et al. Evaluation of effectiveness of humoral immune response after vaccination with «CoviVaс». Medical alphabet. – 2022. – V. 1. – №. 6. – P. 18–24. In Russian. doi: 10.33667/2078-5631-2022-6-18-24.
11. Agletdinov E.F. The results of the study of cellular immunity of a patient with COVID-19 and a convalescent, promising laboratory technologies for assessing the quality of circulating antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 (report) 10/19/2021 // «Laboratory support of a new coronavirus infection» VII Russian Congress on Laboratory Medicine, 19–21 October 2021, Moscow. In Russian.
12. Levin M.J. et al. Intramuscular AZD7442 (tixagevimab–cilgavimab) for prevention of COVID-19 // N. Engl. J. Med . – 2022. – V. 386. – №. 23. – P. 2188–2200. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2116620.
13. Kazakov S.P. Vaccines against a new coronavirus infection: mechanisms of action, the possibility of their use in oncohematological patients (Chapter 1). P. 4–26 // Management of patients with oncohematological profile during the COVID-19 pandemic: Guide / Ed. academician RAS I.V. Poddubnaya. – M.: Econ-Inform, 2022. – 140 p. In Russian.
14. Komissarov A.A. et al. Boosting of the SARS-CoV-2–Specific Immune Response after Vaccination with Single-Dose Sputnik Light Vaccine // J. Immunol. – 2022. – V. 208. – №. 5. – P. 1139–1145. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2101052.
15. Piñana J.L. et al. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response and rate of breakthrough infection in patients with hematological disorders // J. Hematol. Oncol. – 2022. – V. 15. – №. 1. – P. 54. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01275-7.
16. Haggenburg S. et al. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced humoral and cellular immunity in patients with hematologic malignancies // Seminars in Hematology. – WB Saunders, 2022. – V. 59. – №. 4. – P. 192–197. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2022.11.001.