РОБОТ-АССИСТИРОВАННАЯ ПЛАСТИКА ЛОХАНОЧНО-МОЧЕТОЧНИКОВОГО СЕГМЕНТА МОЧЕТОЧНИКА У РЕБЕНКА. ПЕРВЫЙ ОПЫТ
Клинический случай
Дата публикации: апреля 16, 2023
Ключевые слова
гидронефроз
робот-ассистированная хирургия
дети
робот-ассистированная хирургия
дети
Как цитировать
[1]
.
Аннотация
В статье представлено описание клинического наблюдения. Мальчику 16 лет с левосторонним гидронефрозом, вызванным компрессией/стриктурой (?) мочеточника добавочным сосудом нижнего полюса почки, впервые в нашей клинике выполнена робот-ассистированная пластика лоханочно-мочеточникового сегмента слева.Литература
1. Mattioli G., Petralia P. Pediatric robotic surgery technical and management aspects. – Springer International Publishing Switzerland. – 2017. – 199 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-41863-6.
2. Meininger D.D. et al. Totally endoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a robotic system in a child // Surg Endosc. – 2001. – V. 15. – № 11. – P. 1360. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-4200-3.
3. Козлов Ю.А. и др. Робот-ассистированная хирургия у детей – современное состояние проблемы и перспективы развития // Российский вестник детской хирургии, анестезиологии и реаниматологии. – 2015. – Т. 5. – № 3. – C. 63–68. [Kozlov Ju.A. et al. Robot-assisted surgery in children – state of the art and perspectives of the development // Rossijskij vestnik detskoj hirurgii, anesteziologii i reanimatologii (Russian Bulletin of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesiology and Resuscitation). – 2013. – V. 5. – № 3. – P. 63–68. In Russian].
4. Krajewski W. et al. Hydronephrosis in the course of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: an underestimated problem? Current opinions on the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment // Adv Clin Exp Med. – 2017. – V. 26. – № 5. – P. – 857–864. doi: 10.17219/acem/59509.
5. Singh I. et al. Chapter 40: pathophysiology of urinary tract obstruction. In: Campbell-Walsh urology. 10th edn. – Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders. – 2012. – P. 212–219.
6. Gonzalez R. et al. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children // Pediatr Clin N Am. – 2001. – V. 48. – № 6. – P. 1505–1518. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70388-6.
7. Crigger C. et al. Chapter 7: pyeloplasty. In: Minimally invasive and robotic-assisted surgery in pediatric urology. – Springer Nature Switzerland AG. – 2020. – P. 91–100. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-57219-8.
8. Morales-López R.A. et al. Current concepts in pediatric robotic assisted pyeloplasty // Front Pediatr. – 2019. – V. 7. – Article 4. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00004.
9. Satyanarayan A. et al. Advances in robotic surgery for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux: history, present, and future // World J Urol. – 2020. – V. 38. – № 8. – P. 1821–1826. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02753-3.
10. Esposito C. et al. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results // J Pediatr Urol. – 2019. – V. 15. – № 6. – P. 667.e1–667.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.018.
11. Varda B.K. et al. Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015 // J Pediatr Urol. – 2018. – V. 14. – № 4. – P. 336.e1–336.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.010.
12. Masieri L. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review // Minerva Urol Nefrol. – 2020. – V. 72. – № 6. – P. 673–690. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03854-0.
13. Boysen W.R. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique, outcomes, complications, and special considerations in infants // Pediatr Surg Int. – 2017. – V. 33. – № 9. – P. 925–935. doi: 10.1007/s00383-017-4082-7.
14. Kim C. Robotic urologic surgery in infants: results and complications // Front Pediatr. – 2019. – V. 7. – Article 187. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00187
15. Комличенко Э.В. и др. Робот-ассистированные хирургические вмешательства у девочек-подростков с гинекологическими заболеваниями: собственные данные // Проблемы репродукции. – 2021. – Т. 27. – № 6. – C. 81–87. [Komlichenko E.V. et al. Robot-assisted surgical interventions in girls and adolescents with gynecological diseases: own data // Problemy reprodukcii (Russian Journal of Human Reproduction). – 2021. – V. 27. – № 6. – P. 81–87. In Russian]. doi: 10.17116/repro20212706181.
2. Meininger D.D. et al. Totally endoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a robotic system in a child // Surg Endosc. – 2001. – V. 15. – № 11. – P. 1360. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-4200-3.
3. Козлов Ю.А. и др. Робот-ассистированная хирургия у детей – современное состояние проблемы и перспективы развития // Российский вестник детской хирургии, анестезиологии и реаниматологии. – 2015. – Т. 5. – № 3. – C. 63–68. [Kozlov Ju.A. et al. Robot-assisted surgery in children – state of the art and perspectives of the development // Rossijskij vestnik detskoj hirurgii, anesteziologii i reanimatologii (Russian Bulletin of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesiology and Resuscitation). – 2013. – V. 5. – № 3. – P. 63–68. In Russian].
4. Krajewski W. et al. Hydronephrosis in the course of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: an underestimated problem? Current opinions on the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment // Adv Clin Exp Med. – 2017. – V. 26. – № 5. – P. – 857–864. doi: 10.17219/acem/59509.
5. Singh I. et al. Chapter 40: pathophysiology of urinary tract obstruction. In: Campbell-Walsh urology. 10th edn. – Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders. – 2012. – P. 212–219.
6. Gonzalez R. et al. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children // Pediatr Clin N Am. – 2001. – V. 48. – № 6. – P. 1505–1518. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70388-6.
7. Crigger C. et al. Chapter 7: pyeloplasty. In: Minimally invasive and robotic-assisted surgery in pediatric urology. – Springer Nature Switzerland AG. – 2020. – P. 91–100. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-57219-8.
8. Morales-López R.A. et al. Current concepts in pediatric robotic assisted pyeloplasty // Front Pediatr. – 2019. – V. 7. – Article 4. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00004.
9. Satyanarayan A. et al. Advances in robotic surgery for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux: history, present, and future // World J Urol. – 2020. – V. 38. – № 8. – P. 1821–1826. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02753-3.
10. Esposito C. et al. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results // J Pediatr Urol. – 2019. – V. 15. – № 6. – P. 667.e1–667.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.018.
11. Varda B.K. et al. Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015 // J Pediatr Urol. – 2018. – V. 14. – № 4. – P. 336.e1–336.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.010.
12. Masieri L. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review // Minerva Urol Nefrol. – 2020. – V. 72. – № 6. – P. 673–690. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03854-0.
13. Boysen W.R. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique, outcomes, complications, and special considerations in infants // Pediatr Surg Int. – 2017. – V. 33. – № 9. – P. 925–935. doi: 10.1007/s00383-017-4082-7.
14. Kim C. Robotic urologic surgery in infants: results and complications // Front Pediatr. – 2019. – V. 7. – Article 187. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00187
15. Комличенко Э.В. и др. Робот-ассистированные хирургические вмешательства у девочек-подростков с гинекологическими заболеваниями: собственные данные // Проблемы репродукции. – 2021. – Т. 27. – № 6. – C. 81–87. [Komlichenko E.V. et al. Robot-assisted surgical interventions in girls and adolescents with gynecological diseases: own data // Problemy reprodukcii (Russian Journal of Human Reproduction). – 2021. – V. 27. – № 6. – P. 81–87. In Russian]. doi: 10.17116/repro20212706181.