Эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава с применением пар трения керамика – полиэтилен и металл – полиэтилен
Травматология и ортопедия
Дата публикации: марта 9, 2016
Ключевые слова
коксартроз
тотальное эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава
керамика–полиэтилен
металл–полиэтилен
coxarthrosis
total endoprosthesing of coxofemoral joint
ceramics–polyethylene and metal–polyethylene
тотальное эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава
керамика–полиэтилен
металл–полиэтилен
coxarthrosis
total endoprosthesing of coxofemoral joint
ceramics–polyethylene and metal–polyethylene
Как цитировать
Тураходжаев Ф., Загородний Н., Закирова А., Скипенко Т. Эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава с применением пар трения керамика – полиэтилен и металл – полиэтилен // Кремлевская медицина. Клинический вестник. 2016. Т. № 4.
Аннотация
В статье отражены результаты применения пар трения керамика–полиэтилен и металл–полиэтилен при эндопро- тезировании тазобедренного сустава, более 300 пациентам выполнены операции с 2008 по 2014 г. с применением пары трения керамика – полиэтилен и металл – полиэтилен.The article presents results of endoprosthesing of the coxofemoral joint in 300 patients with application of friction pairs of ceramics- polyethylene and metal- polyethylene. The analyzed surgeries were performed in 2008-2014.Литература
1. Максимов А.Л., Горбач Е.Н., Каминский А.В. Анализ
причин асептической нестабильности эндопротеза та-
зобедренного сустава компании «Алтимед» Современные
проблемы науки и образования. 2012; 5.
2. Загородний Н.В. Эндопротезирование тазобедрен-
ного сустава. M., 2012. 134 c.
3. Шубняков И.И., Тихилов Р.М. Достоинства и не-
достатки современных пар трения эндопротезов тазо-
бедренного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России.
2014; 2: 35.
4. Скипенко Т.О., Загородний Н.В. Тотальное эндо-
протезирование тазобедренного сустава с керамика-
керамической парой трения в отдаленном периоде наблю-
дения до 10 лет. Журнал врач-аспирант. 2013; 5.3 (60):
410.
5. Cooper C.J. The local effects of metal corrosion in total
hip arthroplasty. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 2014; 1: 9–18.
6. Cooper H.J., Della Valle C.J. et al. Metal Corrosion at
the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions
after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone J. Surg. 2013; 11: 3–6.
7. Hannouche D., Hamadouche M. et al. Ceramics in total
hip replacement. Clinical. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005; 6: 755–
758.
8. Hamadouche M., Sedel L. Ceramics in orthopaedics. J.
Bone J. Surg. 2000; 8: 1095–1099.
9. Ha Y.C., Koo K.H., Jeong S.T. et al. Cementless aluminaon-alumina
total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50
years: a 5-year minimum follow-up study. J. Arthroplasty. 2007;
2: 184–188.
10. Callaway G.H., Flynn W. et al. Fracture of the femoral
head after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. J.
Arthroplasty. 1995; 6: 855–859.
11. Nho J.H. et al. Ceramic head fracture in ceramic-onpolyethylene
total hip arthroplasty. Yonsei Med. J. 2013; 6:
1550–1553.
12. Habermann B. et al. Fracture of ceramic heads in total
hip replacement. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2006; 7: 464–
470.
13. Geerdink C.H. et al. Cross-linked compared with
historical polyethylenein THA: an 8-year clinical study. Clin.
Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009; 4: 978–984.
14. Beksaç B. et al. Wear is reduced in THA performed
with highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
2009; 467: 979–984.
15. Sato T. et al. Wear resistant performance of highly crosslinked
and annealed ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene
39
Эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава ...
Клинический вестник, 4–2015 Кремлевская медицина
against ceramic heads in total hip arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Res.
2012; 30: 2031–2037.
16. Wang S. et al. Acomparison of polyethylene wear
between cobalt-chrome ball heads and alumina ball heads after
total hip arthroplasty: a 10-yearfollow-up. J. Orthop. Surg. Res.
2013; 1: 1749–1799.
17. Ranawat A.S. et al. Minimum 5-year wear analysis of
first generation highly cross-linked polyethylene in patients 65
years and younger. J. Arthroplasty. 2012; 27: 354–357.
18. Mall N.A. et al. The incidence of acetabular osteolysis
in young patients with conventional versus highly crosslinked
polyethylene. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 2011; 8: 2262-2277.
19. Mutimer J., Devane P.A. et al. Highly cross-linked
polyethylene reduces wear in total hip arthroplasty at 5 years.
Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 2010; 468: 3238-3233.
20. Geerdink C.H. et al. The determination of linear
and angular penetration of femoral head into the acetabular
component as an assessment of wear in total hip replacement:
acomparison of four computer-assistedmethods. J. Bone J. Surg.
2010; 90: 839.
21. Meftah M. et al. Preliminary clinical and radiographic
results of large ceramic heads on highly cross-linked polyethylene.
Orthop. 2011; 4: 133–137.
22. Urban J.A. et al. Ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing
surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Seventeen to twenty-one-year
results. J. Bone J. Surg. 2001; 11: 1688–1694.
23. Dorr L.D. et al. Clinical performance of a Durasul
highlycross-linkedpoly- ethylene acetabular liner for total hip
arthroplasty at five years. J. Bone J. Surg. 2001; 87: 1816–1821.
24. Engh C.A. et al. A randomized prospective evaluation
of out comes after total hip arthroplasty using cross-linked
marathon and non-cross-linked Enduron polyethylene liners. J.
Arthroplasty. 2006; 21: 17–25.
25. Bragdon C.R. et al. The 2012 John Charnley Award:
clinical multicenter studies of the wear performance of highly
crosslinked remelted polyethylenein THA. Clin. Orthop. Rel.
Res. 2013; 2: 432–438.
26. Dumbleton J.H. et al. A literature review of the
association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip
arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 2002; 17: 649–661.
27. Maratoglu O. et al. Ex vivo stability loss of hight
crosslinked ultra-hight molecular weight polyethylene
(UHMWPE) acetabular liner. J. Bone J. Surg. 2010; 17: 2809–
2816.
28. Pokorne, D-Distribution of UHMWPE wear particales
in periprosthetic tissue of total hip replacments. Acta Chir.
Orthop. Traumatol. Cechoslovaca. 2010; 2: 87–92.
29. Gallo J. The relationship of polyehtelen wear to partical
size, distribution, and number: A possible factor explaning the
risk of osteolis after hip arthroplasty. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.
2010; 1: 171–177.
30. Digas G. RSA evaluation of wear conventional versus
hightly cross-linked polyethelen acetabular components in vivo.
Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 2003; 28: 1430.
причин асептической нестабильности эндопротеза та-
зобедренного сустава компании «Алтимед» Современные
проблемы науки и образования. 2012; 5.
2. Загородний Н.В. Эндопротезирование тазобедрен-
ного сустава. M., 2012. 134 c.
3. Шубняков И.И., Тихилов Р.М. Достоинства и не-
достатки современных пар трения эндопротезов тазо-
бедренного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России.
2014; 2: 35.
4. Скипенко Т.О., Загородний Н.В. Тотальное эндо-
протезирование тазобедренного сустава с керамика-
керамической парой трения в отдаленном периоде наблю-
дения до 10 лет. Журнал врач-аспирант. 2013; 5.3 (60):
410.
5. Cooper C.J. The local effects of metal corrosion in total
hip arthroplasty. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 2014; 1: 9–18.
6. Cooper H.J., Della Valle C.J. et al. Metal Corrosion at
the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions
after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone J. Surg. 2013; 11: 3–6.
7. Hannouche D., Hamadouche M. et al. Ceramics in total
hip replacement. Clinical. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005; 6: 755–
758.
8. Hamadouche M., Sedel L. Ceramics in orthopaedics. J.
Bone J. Surg. 2000; 8: 1095–1099.
9. Ha Y.C., Koo K.H., Jeong S.T. et al. Cementless aluminaon-alumina
total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50
years: a 5-year minimum follow-up study. J. Arthroplasty. 2007;
2: 184–188.
10. Callaway G.H., Flynn W. et al. Fracture of the femoral
head after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. J.
Arthroplasty. 1995; 6: 855–859.
11. Nho J.H. et al. Ceramic head fracture in ceramic-onpolyethylene
total hip arthroplasty. Yonsei Med. J. 2013; 6:
1550–1553.
12. Habermann B. et al. Fracture of ceramic heads in total
hip replacement. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2006; 7: 464–
470.
13. Geerdink C.H. et al. Cross-linked compared with
historical polyethylenein THA: an 8-year clinical study. Clin.
Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009; 4: 978–984.
14. Beksaç B. et al. Wear is reduced in THA performed
with highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
2009; 467: 979–984.
15. Sato T. et al. Wear resistant performance of highly crosslinked
and annealed ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene
39
Эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава ...
Клинический вестник, 4–2015 Кремлевская медицина
against ceramic heads in total hip arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Res.
2012; 30: 2031–2037.
16. Wang S. et al. Acomparison of polyethylene wear
between cobalt-chrome ball heads and alumina ball heads after
total hip arthroplasty: a 10-yearfollow-up. J. Orthop. Surg. Res.
2013; 1: 1749–1799.
17. Ranawat A.S. et al. Minimum 5-year wear analysis of
first generation highly cross-linked polyethylene in patients 65
years and younger. J. Arthroplasty. 2012; 27: 354–357.
18. Mall N.A. et al. The incidence of acetabular osteolysis
in young patients with conventional versus highly crosslinked
polyethylene. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 2011; 8: 2262-2277.
19. Mutimer J., Devane P.A. et al. Highly cross-linked
polyethylene reduces wear in total hip arthroplasty at 5 years.
Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 2010; 468: 3238-3233.
20. Geerdink C.H. et al. The determination of linear
and angular penetration of femoral head into the acetabular
component as an assessment of wear in total hip replacement:
acomparison of four computer-assistedmethods. J. Bone J. Surg.
2010; 90: 839.
21. Meftah M. et al. Preliminary clinical and radiographic
results of large ceramic heads on highly cross-linked polyethylene.
Orthop. 2011; 4: 133–137.
22. Urban J.A. et al. Ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing
surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Seventeen to twenty-one-year
results. J. Bone J. Surg. 2001; 11: 1688–1694.
23. Dorr L.D. et al. Clinical performance of a Durasul
highlycross-linkedpoly- ethylene acetabular liner for total hip
arthroplasty at five years. J. Bone J. Surg. 2001; 87: 1816–1821.
24. Engh C.A. et al. A randomized prospective evaluation
of out comes after total hip arthroplasty using cross-linked
marathon and non-cross-linked Enduron polyethylene liners. J.
Arthroplasty. 2006; 21: 17–25.
25. Bragdon C.R. et al. The 2012 John Charnley Award:
clinical multicenter studies of the wear performance of highly
crosslinked remelted polyethylenein THA. Clin. Orthop. Rel.
Res. 2013; 2: 432–438.
26. Dumbleton J.H. et al. A literature review of the
association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip
arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 2002; 17: 649–661.
27. Maratoglu O. et al. Ex vivo stability loss of hight
crosslinked ultra-hight molecular weight polyethylene
(UHMWPE) acetabular liner. J. Bone J. Surg. 2010; 17: 2809–
2816.
28. Pokorne, D-Distribution of UHMWPE wear particales
in periprosthetic tissue of total hip replacments. Acta Chir.
Orthop. Traumatol. Cechoslovaca. 2010; 2: 87–92.
29. Gallo J. The relationship of polyehtelen wear to partical
size, distribution, and number: A possible factor explaning the
risk of osteolis after hip arthroplasty. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.
2010; 1: 171–177.
30. Digas G. RSA evaluation of wear conventional versus
hightly cross-linked polyethelen acetabular components in vivo.
Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 2003; 28: 1430.